Close

Articles Posted in Discrimination – Age

Updated:

New Year Brings a Longer Statute of Limitations But Proceed With Caution For Claims That Arise Before January 1, 2020

As employers across the country reckon with the impacts of the #MeToo movement, the California legislature and Governor Newsom took decisive action to extend the statute of limitations on certain workplace claims, acknowledging that those who have been targeted by discrimination, harassment, and retaliation do not always come forward immediately.…

Updated:

The Ninth Circuit Revives a Garbage Truck Driver’s Claims by Deciding that His Employer’s Reasons for Terminating Him Are Trash

For 32 years, Mr. Santillan worked for USA Waste of California, Inc. becoming perhaps the world’s most beloved garbage truck driver. The customers whose homes he serviced came out in droves to commend his work and he worked for 30 years receiving hardly any discipline. However, that changed when Mr.…

Updated:

Eleventh Circuit Opens the Door to Discrimination Against Older Workers, But Not So in California

Applicants for employment who are over forty years old often face numerous hurdles to finding new employment. In addition to facing stereotypes about their longevity and energy levels, applicants may find themselves searching for a job in a market that has completely changed since the last time they looked for…

Updated:

Statistical Evidence Can Be Used to Prove Discrimination, But Was Not Enough in This Age Discrimination/Lay Off Case

Statistical evidence, layoffs, and age discrimination cases can be tough. Take the situation facing Schechner and Lobertini in their case against KPIX-TV. Both were television news reporters who were laid off in an across the board budget reduction. They brought a lawsuit in federal district court against KPIX-TV, alleging that…

Updated:

Nielsen’s Summary Judgment Reversed in Age Discrimination Case where Younger Employees – even if over the age of 40 themselves – Treated More Leniently for Committing Similar, but not Identical, Violations and Nielsen Failed to Follow its own Procedures

Nielsen Media Research convinced the district court to grant summary judgment in this age discrimination case, and the district court held that plaintiff, Ms. Earl, failed to prove that Nielsen’s actions were a pretext for discrimination. Earl v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., — F.3d —-, 2011 WL 4436250 (9th Cir.…

Updated:

Reid v Google Restores Common Sense to Discrimination Law by Holding that the Judicially Created “Stray Remarks Doctrine” cannot be used to Bar Evidence of Discrimination in a California Age Discrimination Case

The concept of the “stray remarks doctrine” has really never made any sense whatsoever. It is a judicially created doctrine that has historically been used to attempt to circumvent and discount discriminatory statements made by an employer or an employer’s employees or agents. Courts – especially federal courts – have…

Contact Us